<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New &#038; Interesting Brandchannel Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.orange-blog.com/2008/05/12/new-interesting-brandchannel-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.orange-blog.com/2008/05/12/new-interesting-brandchannel-debate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: neal s</title>
		<link>http://www.orange-blog.com/2008/05/12/new-interesting-brandchannel-debate/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>neal s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orange-blog.com/?p=299#comment-61</guid>
		<description>"Ruining" is certainly too strong but there's no question that the 3-D logo movement has withered on the vine. It was never a great idea (and you raise some great points as to why) and I think people are catching up to that realization. I think we'll see the first evidence of a shift before long -- I think it's a matter of months, not years.

Of course, that could just be wishful thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ruining&#8221; is certainly too strong but there&#8217;s no question that the 3-D logo movement has withered on the vine. It was never a great idea (and you raise some great points as to why) and I think people are catching up to that realization. I think we&#8217;ll see the first evidence of a shift before long &#8212; I think it&#8217;s a matter of months, not years.</p>
<p>Of course, that could just be wishful thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
